Some Recommendations
Hello, everyone. Bessie, we all have volunteered to contribute in this group, I extant some recommendations. In today’s environment, standards play a critical role in effective working of any working groups. Thus responsibility for how a standard evolves begins in our working group as-well. I recommend we establish the necessary framework for a sound standardization process. For EAI working group I have below recommendations: *Fundamental Principles of Operation* For the development of standards, openness and due process are mandatory. Openness means that any person who has, or could be reasonably expected to have, a direct and material interest, and who meets the requirements of these procedures has a right to participate by: a) Attending working group meetings b) Becoming a member of the working group c) Expressing a position for chair of working group and its basis, Due process is based upon equity and fair play. The standards development process should strive to have both a balance of interests and not be dominated by any single interest category. *Election of Chair of working group: *The UASG administrative group must get elections done for every working group. The interested members of the working group must file self-nomination or any member of working group should nominate, fundamentally that individual member nominated shall not be on any position in UA administrative group or any other working groups at the same time. Members of the working group should only be allowed to cast the vote and select chair of working group. *Working Group: *Working group member should be individual. Each member is expected to attend meetings. We must record attendance at meetings via teleconferencing and/or electronic means, e.g., Internet conferencing, shall count towards the attendance requirements apart from F2F meeting during ICANN or other events. *Responsibilities of Working Group: * Set goals and deadlines and adhere to them Prioritize work to best serve the group and its goals Get the materials available for community related to working of group Maintain lists of unresolved issues, action items, and assignments. The working group will engage in a fact-finding effort of the perceived problems raised by internationalized domain names (IDN) and long domains in EAI space and what are the possible solutions, and what are the pros and cons relating these possible solutions. What activities are actually underway, how extensive are they. The Working Group can circulated surveys to gather facts about the technical and issues raised by services currently being provided in EAI space. Kind wishes Richard Nims
Thanks a lot Harish Chowdhary On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:25 PM richard nims <richnims@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Bessie, we all have volunteered to contribute in this group, I extant some recommendations. In today’s environment, standards play a critical role in effective working of any working groups. Thus responsibility for how a standard evolves begins in our working group as-well. I recommend we establish the necessary framework for a sound standardization process. For EAI working group I have below recommendations:
*Fundamental Principles of Operation*
For the development of standards, openness and due process are mandatory. Openness means that any person who has, or could be reasonably expected to have, a direct and material interest, and who meets the requirements of these procedures has a right to participate by:
a) Attending working group meetings
b) Becoming a member of the working group
c) Expressing a position for chair of working group and its basis,
Due process is based upon equity and fair play. The standards development process should strive to have both a balance of interests and not be dominated by any single interest category.
*Election of Chair of working group: *The UASG administrative group must get elections done for every working group. The interested members of the working group must file self-nomination or any member of working group should nominate, fundamentally that individual member nominated shall not be on any position in UA administrative group or any other working groups at the same time. Members of the working group should only be allowed to cast the vote and select chair of working group.
*Working Group: *Working group member should be individual. Each member is expected to attend meetings. We must record attendance at meetings via teleconferencing and/or electronic means, e.g., Internet conferencing, shall count towards the attendance requirements apart from F2F meeting during ICANN or other events.
*Responsibilities of Working Group: *
Set goals and deadlines and adhere to them
Prioritize work to best serve the group and its goals
Get the materials available for community related to working of group
Maintain lists of unresolved issues, action items, and assignments.
The working group will engage in a fact-finding effort of the perceived problems raised by internationalized domain names (IDN) and long domains in EAI space and what are the possible solutions, and what are the pros and cons relating these possible solutions. What activities are actually underway, how extensive are they. The Working Group can circulated surveys to gather facts about the technical and issues raised by services currently being provided in EAI space.
Kind wishes
Richard Nims _______________________________________________ UA-EAI mailing list UA-EAI@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- *Thanks,Harish Chowdhary,Technology Analyst* www.indiaig.in
Well constructed, Richard . Regards. Peter On Jul 30, 2019 5:55 PM, "richard nims" <richnims@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Bessie, we all have volunteered to contribute in this group, I extant some recommendations. In today’s environment, standards play a critical role in effective working of any working groups. Thus responsibility for how a standard evolves begins in our working group as-well. I recommend we establish the necessary framework for a sound standardization process. For EAI working group I have below recommendations:
*Fundamental Principles of Operation*
For the development of standards, openness and due process are mandatory. Openness means that any person who has, or could be reasonably expected to have, a direct and material interest, and who meets the requirements of these procedures has a right to participate by:
a) Attending working group meetings
b) Becoming a member of the working group
c) Expressing a position for chair of working group and its basis,
Due process is based upon equity and fair play. The standards development process should strive to have both a balance of interests and not be dominated by any single interest category.
*Election of Chair of working group: *The UASG administrative group must get elections done for every working group. The interested members of the working group must file self-nomination or any member of working group should nominate, fundamentally that individual member nominated shall not be on any position in UA administrative group or any other working groups at the same time. Members of the working group should only be allowed to cast the vote and select chair of working group.
*Working Group: *Working group member should be individual. Each member is expected to attend meetings. We must record attendance at meetings via teleconferencing and/or electronic means, e.g., Internet conferencing, shall count towards the attendance requirements apart from F2F meeting during ICANN or other events.
*Responsibilities of Working Group: *
Set goals and deadlines and adhere to them
Prioritize work to best serve the group and its goals
Get the materials available for community related to working of group
Maintain lists of unresolved issues, action items, and assignments.
The working group will engage in a fact-finding effort of the perceived problems raised by internationalized domain names (IDN) and long domains in EAI space and what are the possible solutions, and what are the pros and cons relating these possible solutions. What activities are actually underway, how extensive are they. The Working Group can circulated surveys to gather facts about the technical and issues raised by services currently being provided in EAI space.
Kind wishes
Richard Nims
_______________________________________________ UA-EAI mailing list UA-EAI@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (3)
-
Akinremi Peter Taiwo -
Harish Chowdhary -
richard nims