Re: [vip] Draft on IDN Tables in XML
Hi Shawn, On Mar 11, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Shawn Steele wrote: So, as a 3rd party, I'm not sure how this information is very helpful to me? I mean, it'd tell me what the registry hoped to do for it's zone, but that may or may not match the DNS entries. I can discover valid domains by querying the DNS itself, I don't need to access the list. I can see how this information might be helpful for tools that help people manage their zones, however any tools that talked to themselves wouldn't necessarily need this format (though it'd help to be able to import/export the data this way, and maybe interoperate better with other tools). I guess what I'm getting at is: What kinds of applications are expected to consume this data? What's the target? The target is really registries, albeit potentially registries at multiple levels of the DNS — not just TLD registries. While other software like end-user applications consume the data, I am not sure what the benefit would be. Once it is in a DNS zone, it is a domain name, and would be expected to resolve. Tables are really beneficial as part of the provisioning process. kim
On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: On 12 mar 2012, at 07:22, Kim Davies wrote: The target is really registries Not registrars? I'm not aware of any registrars today that use IDN tables in their business logic. They could use them to filter out known-bad labels before they start an EPP transaction, and to generate variant sets for registries that do not do their own variant handling, so I agree they could be another potential user. kim
On 12 mar 2012, at 08:09, Kim Davies wrote:
I'm not aware of any registrars today that use IDN tables in their business logic. They could use them to filter out known-bad labels before they start an EPP transaction, and to generate variant sets for registries that do not do their own variant handling, so I agree they could be another potential user.
The reason I ask is because on the epp mailing list in IETF there is an ongoing discussion where the registries and registrars completely disagree on how the validation of a string is to happen, and who has the responsibility to implement it. So, this is another stick that someone poked into the ant hill. paf
participants (2)
-
Kim Davies -
Patrik Fältström