Hi all sorry I missed the last call, I had an unchangeable conflict unfortunately.
In substance it looks good to me, I would possibly argue that there was quite broad support for the legal opinion trigger rather than “some”, while recognising that that support did not reach consensus levels but I don’t want to get into wordsmithing as I recognise that we are asking the important question to the public of wether they support such a process anyway.
Nits:
There appears to be a duplication of the ToC on page 2.

Other than that looks good to go to me.

-James

On 9 Sep 2015, at 22:30, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund@icann.org> wrote:

All,

Attached please find the current draft preliminary report for your consideration. As discussed on the call, IAG members would have one week to propose any changes including the addition of minority statements. Please submit your edits no later than 23:59 UTC on 17 September 2015. ICANN will then seek comment on the document on 24 September 2015. 

Please note some of the larger changes in the document: first, I removed all references to “consensus.” My colleagues in policy support remind me that consensus only applies after public comment is taken into account. Second, I added James’s full proposal to a new Appendix 2. Finally, I cleaned up the formatting.

Thank you again for your input and participation. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about the draft.

Best,
Jamie 

Jamie Hedlund
VP, Strategic Programs
Global Domains Division
ICANN
+1.202.374.3969 (m)
+1.202.570.7125 (d)
<IAG Draft Report v4 .docx>_______________________________________________
Whois-iag-volunteers mailing list
Whois-iag-volunteers@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-iag-volunteers