Christopher Short answer: because the EWG recommendations have neither been accepted nor is there any timeline for their implementation in whole or in part. Regards Michele PS: I was on the EWG -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 07/07/2015 20:13, "whois-iag-volunteers-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Christopher Wilkinson" <whois-iag-volunteers-bounces@icann.org on behalf of cw@christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:

...

https://www.icann.org/news/blog/ewg-recommends-a-replacement-for-whois

Good afternoon:

Since I detect a certain uncertainty, if not a delay, as to what to do next, may I recall that ICANN has already gone to some lengths towards replacing Whois altogether.

In which case, why exactly, are we spending time on tweaking the ancient policy?

Regards

CW

_______________________________________________ Whois-iag-volunteers mailing list Whois-iag-volunteers@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-iag-volunteers