David, Have the members of WS2 finalized the questions for staff? Please clarify and provide me with your finalized questions at your earliest convenience. Larisa -----Original Message----- From: workstream2-atrt2-bounces@icann.org [mailto:workstream2-atrt2-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 5:06 AM To: workstream2-atrt2@icann.org Subject: Re: [Work Stream 2 ATRT 2] Today's call Hi, I have looked at David's questions and tried looking for other questions that would somehow be less rigorous and easier to answer, aka higher level questiosn that can be answered with generalities. But I agree with others. These are the details that need to be known. If it is only a project milestone that shows what is done and what is not done and why, that will fine. While providing answers for everything in the questionnaire we will have made a good start of it. All of the questions look to me like the kind of things a project manager should be answer relatively easily. Somehow the answer, go away and find better questions does not seem such an appropriate answer to me. I look at the questions, and most of them are easily answered: No but there is when Yes here is the pointer An additional question I have, is to what degree Patrick thinks that they have what they need to do the work in a full and efficient manner. And if they don't have all of the resources and capacities they need, what is missing? has it been requested? what is the issue? thanks avri On 24 Jun 2013, at 10:54, Larisa B. Gurnick wrote:

David, Patrick would appreciate getting your questions by 3 July in order to prepare responses before Durban.

Larisa

-----Original Message----- From: workstream2-atrt2-bounces@icann.org [mailto:workstream2-atrt2-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of David Conrad Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 7:52 AM To: workstream2-atrt2@icann.org Subject: [Work Stream 2 ATRT 2] Today's call

Hi,

Due to dayjob responsibilities, I wasn't able to get as far as I would've liked on revising the questions for Patrick. Since I haven't received any additional input from anyone (hint, hint :)), I proposing canceling this week's call and discussing things next Monday. However, if anyone would like to raise some issues on a call today, let the team know and we'll go ahead.

Thanks, -drc

_______________________________________________ workstream2-atrt2 mailing list workstream2-atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/workstream2-atrt2

_______________________________________________ workstream2-atrt2 mailing list workstream2-atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/workstream2-atrt2

_______________________________________________ workstream2-atrt2 mailing list workstream2-atrt2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/workstream2-atrt2

Hi Olivier, On Jun 24, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:

I am happy with the questions you have submitted so far.

For the record, I'm not -- too detailed. I believe we need to pop up a level and am working on that.

I understand that the WestLake report commissioned by the Board DNS-RM Framework is likely to be released today.

I've heard this as well. Looking forward to reading it.

This might provide us with some trigger to additional questions; apart from the question I asked on the last call regarding the place of the DSSA, a community-led study specific to the Analysis of the Stability of the Internet. Will we have a session with Patrick in Durban so we can interact with him?

Yes. Patrick gets in on Thursday. I'll set up a Doodle poll to figure out the most convenient time to meet. Regards, -drc