Hallo Brian,

Work stream 4 with work assignment; to consider the extent to which assessments and actions undertaken by ICANN have been successful in ensuring that ICANN is acting transparently, is accountable for its decision-making, and acts in the public interest; would like to seek input from the other work streams by requesting answers to questions such as:

1. Does the review process and implementation of recommendations satisfy the standard outlined in the affirmation?
2. What one recommendations stands out as well implemented and the rationale for concluding it is well implemented?
3. What one recommendation stands out as poorly implemented and the rationale for concluding it is poorly implemented?
4. What can ICANN learn from review process?
5. What worked well?  What did not work well?  What adjustments had to be made then or need to be made now?
6. Are there recommendations that ICANN could not implement and why?

I would like to welcome questions from other members of the workstream 4 to work streams 1,2 &3.

Kind regards

Fiona Asonga