So if one were to draw an "option" for the CCWG to consider from the WP poll (Q1 where there was greatest Delta between yes and no) it would be a reference to human rights in the bylaws without any reference to a particular document.

That seems to correlate largely with option 2 in the proposal which also had the greatest support:

            Within its mission and in it operations, ICANN will be committed to respect internationally recognized fundamental human rights.


If so does that suggest that one could consider the WP poll an indicator of additional support for that option?  (Although the words "internationally" and "fundamental" still cause me indigestion.)

Matthew

On 12/10/2015 22:52, Avri Doria wrote:

On 12-Oct-15 17:41, Matthew Shears wrote:
I have to ask - how much actual support did the last two options get?hi,
According to the results listed by Leon:

Q1 Yes  -  5
     No   -  18
 
Q2 Yes  -  11
     No   -  12
 
Q3 None or NA  -  13
     Not Sure  -  3

specific recommendations

2 for just Ruggie
2  for UDHR + Ruggie
6 for UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR

  International bill of human rights , Regional and Domestic
commitments to same.
·        my read is if one answers 1 and 2 with No then 3 is
irrelevant.   I note that some others have, however, put in the UN
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights for 3 even though they
have said no to 1 and 2.

   that is be guided by the Guiding Principles on business and human
rights
·        The UDHR is the only instrument that is of sufficient
universality.
·        The UDHR is the only instrument that is of sufficient
universality.
·        UDHR & UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
·        UDHR & UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
·        UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
·        UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
·        UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
·        UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
·        UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
·        UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights



And what about highlighting the results for the 2 options in the
proposal itself?

Matthew

On 12/10/2015 20:30, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hello,

Based on the outcome of the poll, I wonder why option 2 through to 4
will be applicable anymore. I quote below just incase:

"....In brief, the WP has expressed in a vast majority that No
reference to a specific document should be included in the suggested
bylaw text."

Regards

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.

On 12 Oct 2015 20:24, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel@channelisles.net
<mailto:nigel@channelisles.net>> wrote:


    I like this approach.

    The wording can be made more concise and less ambgiuous as follows.

    Here are the four alternatices.


    1.       Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
    respect internationally recognized human rights.

    2.      Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
    respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in
    the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    3.      Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
    respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in
    the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International
    Covenant on Cultural and Political Rights and the International
    Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

    4.       Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
    respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in
    the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International
    Covenant on Cultural and Political Rights and the International
    Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and will carry
    out its work guided by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and
    Human Rights.
    _______________________________________________
    Wp4 mailing list
    Wp4@icann.org <mailto:Wp4@icann.org>
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4



_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology 
mshears@cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> 	

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>




_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology 
mshears@cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987 



Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com