I've dialled in but all I get is a recorded message saying a co-ordinator will assist me momentarily repeated ad nauseam.
On 30/10/15 14:57, Greg Shatan wrote:
As Tanya requested, I've uploaded the clean version of the document
circulated last night to Google Drive. Here is the link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bm0NnIq35j3-EwmBwKEjSOJia-c10wv0mhHytngTDiM/edit?usp=sharing
Greg
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina@mpicc.de<mailto:t.tropina@mpicc.de>> wrote:
Hi Greg,
thanks a lot for providing this starting point for the rationale
document and for pointing out that we have to proceed with what is
meant to be "explanatory" document for the bylaw language. Would it
be possible to share this new draft (clean version) as a Google doc,
so anyone can work on it after (and during, may be) the call? I
think Google docs were really helpful in our previous work. Only if
you have time to do this, of course. Thanks a million!
I also believe that we might consider changing the structure of the
part which was meant to be the rationale document (the text from the
old Google doc). I remember there were some comments and suggestion
for amending/restructuring this "rationale" part in the Google doc
itself and on the WP4 calls. However, this can be discussed during
the call. Or any time later.
Looking forward to the call.
Cheers
Tanya
On 30/10/15 08:04, Greg Shatan wrote:
<gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> wrote:All,
As promised, here is the document I propose as the starting point
for our drafting. Since the portion where I edited down the
comment analysis is difficult to read in the marked version, I've
also included a clean version.
I look forward to our call.
Greg
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Greg Shatan
Leon and all,
On point 3, I don't understand why we would be adding to or
amending the Second Public Comment document. This document
has now been published as part of the CCWG's overall review of
the public comments. I think this document is pretty much closed.
On the other hand, we were working on a rationale document in
a Google Doc before the public comment analysis and then
Dublin took over our lives. I think what we need to do is
work on a document that uses as its starting point (i) the
second draft report section on human rights, (ii) pieces of
the rationale document, (iii) a fairly brief
discussion/analysis of the comments and (iv) the new material
provided by Leon. The ultimate goal should be to turn this
into the human rights section of the next draft of the
report. I've been working on such a document and should have
a draft shortly. I won't have it as far along as I'd hoped,
due to a medical emergency in my family, but hopefully it will
be far enough along to give a sense of where it could go.
Greg
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:29 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
<<mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>leonfelipe@sanchez.mx
<mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>> wrote:
Dear all,
In anticipation for our call, I suggest the following agenda:
1. Welcome
2. Explanation by Paul Twomey on practical steps involved
in changes of TLD operator (focused on ccTLD)
3. Review of proposed addition to our PC2 document
4 AOB
Of course, and as usual, this agenda is a suggestion and
open for amendments.
Staff,
Please be ready to display the document in the AC room.
Best regards,
León
_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org <mailto:Wp4@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org <mailto:Wp4@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
_______________________________________________
Wp4 mailing list
Wp4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4