Revised bylaw language by counsel
Dear all, As per our action items in our last call, I requested that our lawyers had a look at our document and checked on the proposed bylaw wording. Attached are the redline and clean versions of the work our counsel did. I believe this could be, subject to this group’s consensus, the final version for inclusion in our 3rd proposal. Looking forward for your feedback. Best regards, León
Very clever. I am in awe of the mind behind this. When interpreted by a court, this new proposal removes any last obligation on ICANN to have any obligations for human rights whatsoever. The exercise on how this is done is left to the constructionist lawyers among us. But here's my take. Taking the blue lined suggested additions, it all depends on the construction on the term 'applicable law' in California. This is even more unacceptable. On 11/05/2015 09:58 PM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
Attached are the redline and clean versions of the work our counsel did. I believe this could be, subject to this group’s consensus, the final version for inclusion in our 3rd proposal.
Just to be on the record, we don't have consensus about this (yet). el On 2015-11-05 23:58, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
Dear all,
As per our action items in our last call, I requested that our lawyers had a look at our document and checked on the proposed bylaw wording.
Attached are the redline and clean versions of the work our counsel did. I believe this could be, subject to this group’s consensus, the final version for inclusion in our 3rd proposal.
Looking forward for your feedback.
Best regards,
León
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
And in order to consent or object, can you please arrange for PDF's to be generated and sent? el On 2015-11-06 12:38, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Just to be on the record, we don't have consensus about this (yet).
el
On 2015-11-05 23:58, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
Dear all,
As per our action items in our last call, I requested that our lawyers had a look at our document and checked on the proposed bylaw wording.
Attached are the redline and clean versions of the work our counsel did. I believe this could be, subject to this group’s consensus, the final version for inclusion in our 3rd proposal.
Looking forward for your feedback.
Best regards,
León
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse 4-5, St Annes Walk <Directors@omadhina.net> Alderney, Guernsey, GY9 3JZ Omadhina Internet Services Ltd British Channel Islands
participants (4)
-
Dr Eberhard W Lisse -
Dr Eberhard W Lisse -
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía -
Nigel Roberts