It was deleted in the final version as proposed by Julie Hammer and approved by Fiona and Rafik.

Cheers

B.

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:25 PM, RAHMOUNI Dalila <dalila.rahmouni@diplomatie.gouv.fr> wrote:

Dear Bernard,

 

Thank you very much for the documents that take into account the question of the office.

As underlined by Sebastien, it is not a minority and I propose to delete this word.

 

Best,

Dalila

 

De : ws2-diversity-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-diversity-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Sebastien Bachollet
Envoyé : mercredi 23 août 2017 20:55
À : Bernard Turcotte
Cc : ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org); ws2-diversity
Objet : Re: [Ws2-diversity] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Diversity WS2 DIVERSITY REPORTV6.0clean

 

Thanks

But I am still not sure it is a minority view.

SeB

Envoyé de mon iPhone


Le 22 août 2017 à 18:22, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> a écrit :

All,

 

Rafik and Fiona have asked me to forward the draft final version of the Diversity report which includes a minority-type statement for a Diversity Office at the end of the recommendations (both instances) as agreed on our last call.

 

Bernard Turcotte

ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2

<WS2 DIVERSITY REPORTV6.0clean.pdf>

_______________________________________________
Ws2-diversity mailing list
Ws2-diversity@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity