Hi Everyone,
Apologies that I have not raised this point before now, but due to other commitments, I have only just now had the opportunity to look more closely at the spreadsheet. In doing so, I have seen that the SSAC Questionnaire Response has been inadvertently misrepresented in the spreadsheet, as follows:
Question 2. In answering this question, it is important to record the relevance of each additional element to the SSAC, in accordance with the SSAC definitions of importance, as advised in the SSAC Response. Without that information, the importance of all 4 elements to the SSAC is open to misunderstanding I therefore request that the entry be updated as follows:
Secondary Importance:
Career background (eg public service, private sector, academia, law enforcement)
Time involved in ICANN
Lesser Relevance:
Education
Sexual orientation
Many thanks.
Cheers, Julie
Hello all,
The raw caption notes, recordings (in English, French & Spanish) and transcripts for CCWG Accountability WS2 Diversity Subgroup Meeting #25 – 15 June 2017 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/GiHwAw.
A copy of the notes are attached to this email and also may be found below.
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Yvette Guigneaux
(MSSI) Multistakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives
Projects & Operations Assistant.
ICANN – Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Cell: +1-310-460-8432
Skype: yvette.guigneaux.icann
<image002.png>
Raw Captioning Notes - Please note that these are the unofficial transcript. Official transcript will be posted 2-3 days after the call
· Word Doc
· PDF
Documents