Hi Julie,

Thanks for the edits and welcome back :)
in the last call, we went through recommendations and several questions were raised. Some concerns were about the fact that several recommendations are too general or abstract, not being written as requirements that can be translated into implementation later and that we don't have some metric that implementation can be tested against. 

We agreed to rework the recommendations to be more specific and give guidance to the staff when implementation time comes (it doesn't mean we give a specific solution but explaining what we want). I am thinking that using IETF-like way like using the word shall, must etc would be helpful. We are also waiting for the recommendation guidelines promised by Bernie. To review the recommendations, we can check if it is elaborated as requirements and have a clear target.

I made some suggestions for change to the recommendations and looking for comments from the subgroup members.

Best,

Rafik

2017-07-28 12:07 GMT+09:00 Julie Hammer <julie.hammer@bigpond.com>:
Hi Fiona, Rafik and Everyone,

I have just finally got back up to date with the work of the Diversity Sub-group.  Apologies that I have not been able to join the last few meetings.  I have read the transcript of the last meeting, looked at all the survey responses, and made  some comments/suggestions in the Google Doc (V3 dated 21 June).  I have added the Questionnaire as ANNEX D but have not made any changes to the wording of the recommendations as I am not confident I understand the intended changes as discussed in the last meeting.

 I look forward to speaking with you all tonight.

Cheers,  Julie

On 28 Jul 2017, at 9:51 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Rafik

Thanks for the reply

The comment was about maybe the group would want to address these new responses tomorrow during the meeting.

I have not read them thoroughly yet so not sure whether it changes anything but will follow whatever the group decision is

Thanks


On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> wrote:
hi Renata,

checking the consolidated document, I see that board response is included but the staff/icann one is missing. we can add that and update the draft report too.
I am not sure to understand your suggestion about having a broader picture. do you want the subgroup to come back to the questionnaire responses review as that was done previously?

Best,

Rafik

2017-07-28 6:24 GMT+09:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino@gmail.com>:
Dear all

Given the latest updates on answers to the questionnaire, we would likely have a broader picture than the consolidated updates. Thanks for any light on this.

Best,

Renata

_______________________________________________
Ws2-diversity mailing list
Ws2-diversity@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity



_______________________________________________
Ws2-diversity mailing list
Ws2-diversity@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity