Agreed– that is correct Steve, what I meant
Best regards,
David
David McAuley
Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager
Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154
From: Steve DelBianco [mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 2:49 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com>; McAuley, David <dmcauley@Verisign.com>
Cc: ws2-hr@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Drafting Team member - Suggested Text [renamed subject line]
Anne — I think David is making a distinction between how ICANN (the corporation) implements its HR policies in its operations and compliance, versus how gNSO and ccNSO consider HR in their development
of policies.
Is that right, David? If so, this could clarify the current discussion.
From: <ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 2:33 PM
To: David McAuley <dmcauley@verisign.com>
Cc: "ws2-hr@icann.org" <ws2-hr@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Drafting Team member - Suggested Text [renamed subject line]
Hi David,
I still think that if ICANN org is going to adopt a "framework" to assess its impact on Human Rights, it has to go to the SOs and ACs before doing so in order to respect their role in the policy-making
process. Again, this is in the Considerations document already and it specifically refers to adoption of a "framework" so we don't want to say it is up to ICANN the organisation to make that choice of "framework" unless we mean that ICANN org must consult
with SOs and ACs first. Is that what we mean?
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 office
520.879.4725 fax
_______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
-----Original Message-----
From:
ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of McAuley, David via Ws2-hr
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 10:20 AM
To:
ws2-hr@icann.org
Subject: [Ws2-hr] Drafting Team member - Suggested Text [renamed subject line]
As part of the drafting team recruited yesterday during the call, I would like to suggest text to consider (BTW – I don’t think there is a separate “drafting team” email list for this discrete
effort).
BACKGROUND:
Here is text as proposed by Niels prior to our call yesterday (the original text is in his email forwarded below):
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and
offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual
reporting.
I suggested a different text on list yesterday but I have tweaked it in my latest suggested text below to take account of two points Kavouss made on list.
First, I use the word “mechanism” instead of “framework” and I add a reference to voluntary remediation, agreeing with Kavouss to attempt to address comments by several country reps to the group.
MY LATEST SUGGESTED TEXT:
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a mechanism like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. It
could also consider, in appropriate cases, voluntary remediation efforts. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether to do so, and if so how (i.e., choosing the most appropriate framework, instrument, or remediation effort). The results
of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Best regards,
David
David McAuley
Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154
-----Original Message-----
From:
ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 3:55 PM
To:
ws2-hr@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Ws2-hr] red line
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop
and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer
remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual
reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient
or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered
by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list