Kavouss,
I in fact said the opposite of what you are asserting and asked that the notes be corrected in this regard. GNSO policy-making and GAC policy-making should
both be affected and Mark Cavell was simply confirming this principle. I think you misinterpreted both of us. I hope this is now clear.
Unfortunately I will be unable to participate in the call today due to client conflicts.
Thank you,
Anne
|
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese |
|
Of Counsel |
|
520.629.4428 office |
|
520.879.4725 fax |
|
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP |
|
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 |
|
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 |
From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:47 AM
To: <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>
Cc: <ws2-hr@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda February 21 19:00 UTC
Dear All,
In view of what I said in previous message,
The following should are the amendments that I suggest. See Attachment
Regards
Kavouss
2017-02-21 13:29 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>:
Dear Niels,
At our last meeting , ANN and someone else tried to treat GAC and two other SOs namely GNSO and ccNSO in regard with respecting Human Rights quite differently to which I objected.
The two supporting organizations provide re3commendations to ICANN Board based on their respective PDP developed.
GAC provide Advice to the Board based on Public Policy issues .
The treatment of these output by ICANN Board must be equal.
In other words if they are examined against respecting, all three should undergo that criteria if not none of them.
Consequently the text in the document must have equal weighting and equal status.
I also do not understand one GAC member indicating GAC Advice should respect Human Rights, which I have problem on that, but that GAC member did not say that GNSO and ccNSO policies must also respect Human Rights.
The unequal treatment that was mentioned by that GAC member is inappropriate
Regards
Kavouss
2017-02-21 9:12 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>:
Please accept my apologies. Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC is for the time being not feasible for me due to other commitments.
Kind regards
Jorge
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Niels ten Oever
Gesendet: Montag, 20. Februar 2017 21:37
An: ws2-hr <ws2-hr@icann.org>
Betreff: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda February 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you well. Please find underneath and attached the proposed agenda.
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Discussion of work-in-progress considerations document by drafting team 3. AOB
Please find also attached the current version of the work-in-progress considerations document, which at this moment is a rough sketch for discussion in the drafting group.
It can also be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3Oi5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit
I'm greatly looking forward to talk to you all tomorrow.
Best,
Niels
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr