response.
Dear Niels
May I kindly request clarification on the status of our inquiry into the
(legal) effects that the HR commitment we are talking about is a "core
value"?
According to the new Bylaws "core values" are “guidance” (“should also
guide the decisions and actions of ICANN…”) and are subject to a
specific balancing and interpretation clause:
"(c) The Commitments and Core Values are intended to apply in the broadest
possible range of circumstances. The Commitments reflect ICANN’s
fundamental compact with the global Internet community and are intended to
apply consistently and comprehensively to ICANN’s activities. The specific
way in which Core Values are applied, individually and collectively, to any
given situation may depend on many factors that cannot be fully anticipated
or enumerated. Situations may arise in which perfect fidelity to all Core
Values simultaneously is not possible. Accordingly, in any situation where
one Core Value must be balanced with another, potentially competing Core
Value, the result of the balancing must serve a policy developed through the
bottom-up multistakeholder process or otherwise best serve ICANN’s Mission."
I feel this is quite relevant for our discussions, as it sets the frame
of the effect of the new HR "core value".
Best and looking forward to your guidance and apologies if I have missed
any relevant message on this issue
Jorge
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Auftrag von Niels ten Oever
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 00:19
Betreff: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda Call Sept 6 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
Please find underneath and attached the proposed agenda for our call of
Sept 6 19:00 UTC.
Also please find attached a rather advanced version of the document
mentioned under agenda point 2, the summary of the Human Rights work
under Workstream 1.
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Discussion on: the Summary on what was agreed and discussed on human
rights during WS1
3. Discussion on: Concerns on possible impacts of Human Rights bylaw and
FoI
4. Discussion on FoI draft document
5. AOB
ICANN staff informed me that they are working on providing more real
time collaboration methods, but currently they do not offer such
services. So until that time I am afraid we are stuck with Google Docs.
As always feel free to suggest addition or changes to the points above.
Best,
Niels
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9