Dear Niels, Jorge and colleagues

I have continued to read the stream of emails of this list over the last months with great attention. 

This document (as it is or may be amended by Jorge) I think is a good balance between the need to implement the bylaw and the complexity of the issues when raised.

I just wanted to confirm that I think this language,  and the subsidiarity process of ACs and SOs etc interpreting the bylaw requirement as it applies to their circumstances, lessens significantly the operational risks I raised at an earlier time.   

I would be willing to support this approach.

Best

Paul

Paul Twomey


On 2/28/17 2:26 AM, Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch wrote:

Dear Niels and all

 

Further to the comment below, please find attached a version of the document with further suggestions and comments/questions (which I have also included in the Google Doc).

 

It is unfortunate that I can no longer attend the meetings as they always are at the same time and at least in Europe fall in the evening, where other commitments and obligations of a different nature are due. Maybe we could reconsider the non-rotation of the meetings…

 

Nonetheless, I hope that these comments may be taken on board during today’s call.

 

@staff: please mention my comments during the call, as if I was there J

 

Kind regards

 

Jorge

 

 

 

Von: Cancio Jorge BAKOM
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 06:38
An: Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net>; ws2-hr@icann.org
Betreff: AW: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document Feb 28 19:00 UTC

 

Dear Niels

 

While I will not be able to attend the call this evening, I disagree with the wording of this sentence:

 

"However, there was not sufficient support to recommend the application of the UN Guiding Principles for the interpretation of the Bylaw."

 

The WG did not reach consensus or did not reach agreement - which is the way we worked. Saying that "there was not sufficient support" mischaracterizes the way we work(ed) and may imply that there was some sort of voting, which was not the case.

 

Therefore I would propose the following text:

 

"However, there was no agreement on whether to recommend the application of the UN Guiding Principles for the interpretation of the Bylaw."

 

Hope you may take this on board.

 

regards

 

Jorge

 

 



Von: Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net>
Datum: 28.
Februar 2017 um 01:16:01 MEZ
An:
ws2-hr@icann.org <ws2-hr@icann.org>
Betreff: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document Feb 28 19:00 UTC

 

Dear all,

It is with great pleasure that I can share with you the draft agenda for
the meeting of February 28, 19:00 UTC.

The drafting group worked hard after the constructive session last week.
With this document we might have arrived at a new milestone.

I am very much looking forward to have a first reading of the
Considerations document with you in the call. As previously discussed,
the Consideration document will be merged into one document with the FoI
upon approval by the subgroup.

I am greatly looking forward to discuss this with you on the call.

Please find the proposed agenda underneath and attached, as well as the
document.

1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the
drafting team
3. AOB

The document can also be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3Oi5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit

Please let me know if you have any question or suggestions.

All the best,

Niels
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9



_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr

-- 
Dr Paul Twomey
Managing Director
Argo P@cific 

US Cell: +1 310 279 2366
Aust M: +61 416 238 501

www.argopacific.com