Would the disagreement be solved by saying,

 

When examining its operations, ICANN the organization should consider
using tools for analysis as suggested in the UNGPs, for example Principle 18, as well as specific instruments such as
HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate tools and instruments to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.

 

 

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman@lrrc.com

_____________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com

 

From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Rudolph Daniel
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 1:17 PM
To: Greg Shatan
Cc: <ws2-hr@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] red line

 

I have some difficulty with  'could consider'......as there seems to be no intent....'should consider' ,  in my view ..goes some way towards a consensus,  but puts the decision firmly into the hands of ICANN... Using the formation that follows...(?)
rd

 

On Aug 8, 2017 5:55 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

Here's a redline.

 

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:

Hi all,

Original text:

When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also
consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human
Rights.  However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and
implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s
annual reporting.

Text proposed by me on the call:

When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider
using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as
HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.

I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.

Best,

Niels


--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr

 


_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.