It seems certain that ICANN would have the USG Contractor obligations summarized in the memo pursuant to the FAR provisions applicable to the IANA contract.
Once that contract expires on September 30, I would have a question as to whether ICANN will be a US government contractor subject to FAR. (Don’t know that the award of .mil and .gov would come within the jurisdiction of the Federal Acquisition Regulations.)
Will ICANN remain a USG contractor post IANA transition?
|
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese |
|
Of Counsel |
|
520.629.4428 office |
|
520.879.4725 fax |
|
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP |
|
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 |
|
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 |
From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Karen Mulberry
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:48 AM
To: ws2-hr@icann.org
Subject: [Ws2-hr] CCWG-Acct HR Subgroup Response to question ICANN Legal should be asked what Human Rights Law is applicable to ICANN operations
Here is a memo from Sidley Austin LLP to the CCWG during WS1 that addresses the question the subgroup raised - ICANN Legal should be asked what Human Rights Law is applicable to ICANN operations.
ICANN legal is supportive of what is set out in the memo.
Karen Mulberry
Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives
ICANN