On 24 Jun 2017, at 7:28 AM, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:

Hi all,

I hope this email finds you all very well. This is just a small reminder that the public comment period for the FoI has ended and the responses can be found here:

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-foi-hr-05may17/2017q2/thread.html

I trust ICANN staff will summarize the comments soon so we can discuss them in our group and see whether we need to make amendments.

Niels - If the subgroup should have the opportunity to make amendments, it might be worth changing the following sentence – "The ASO does not have a similar formal PDP to the ccNSO and the GNSO." since it is not strictly correct – the ASO has a formal global number policy development process, which may be found here: <https://aso.icann.org/global-policies/global-policy-development-process/ <https://aso.icann.org/global-policies/global-policy-development-process/>> The suggestion that follows (“Nonetheless, ASO should also consider how to apply the Human Rights Core Value.”) is not necessarily impacted by this correction, and one possible change that may maintain fidelity to the original intent would be to replace these two sentences with one that reads – "The ASO Global Policy Development Process relies upon consideration of matters within each individual RIR policy fora; nonetheless, the ASO should consider how the Human Rights Core Value is reflected in their global number policy development efforts.” (I am certain there are other equally fine formulations for resolution and suggest this simply as one possible example.) Thanks! /John Disclaimers: my views alone - Accountability CCWG WS2 individual participant