Seun,

If you look at the proposal for path forward document also enclosed along with the agenda, you will find this;

"Each participant should pick one issue which they believe is in scope for us and post that issue......"

regards, parminder

Hello Parminder,

I just looked at the agenda and can't seem to find the "one man one issue" you refer?

That said, if that indeed has been proposed by the Chair then I agree that it isn't appropriate. Infact I don't see why anyone should be formerly tagged with issues raised except where there might be need for clarification. 

I am of the opinion that there should be no limit to issues to be raised so long as they are within scope. The subgroup should own whatever issues raised and address them as such.

Regards

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Aug 16, 2017 6:02 AM, "parminder" <parminder@itforchange.net> wrote:

I disagree with the plan of one person one issue -- it is not a set of entitlements that one is asking for oneself that these can be so distributed, in an apparently democratic manner. These are issues that are being raised on the behalf of the global public, and must be judged on their merit, and not count.

This said, I will still frame one issue and send it along presently ... parminder

On Wednesday 16 August 2017 08:53 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:

All,

Here is the agenda and accompanying documents for tomorrow's meeting.

I look forward to our call.

Greg

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction