Greg
One very tiny “nit” – I assume that the word “jurisdiction” in question four should also have the asterisk that the other three questions have, since we mean the same thing, right?
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig@
redbranchconsulting.com VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/
pks/lookup?op=get&search= 0x9A830097CA066684
From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@
icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org ] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:38 PM
To: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>
Subject: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary
All,
The email below with clean and marked versions of the revised Questionnaire was sent to staff for distribution to the Plenary. Congratulations to the Subgroup for coming to consensus on question 4, which allowed us to complete our revisions to the draft Questionnaire and bring it back to the CCWG-Plenary tomorrow. Soon, we will be able to release our questionnaire and look forward to receiving responses to help inform the subgroup as we continue our work.
Thank you for the spirit of compromise that ultimately allowed us to cross the finish line.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:06 PM
Subject: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary
To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr" <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net>Bernie,
Attached are clean and "track changes" versions of the Questionnaire, showing changes to the prior version of the Questionnaire. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Greg