Dear Greg,

TOP URGENT

I disagree with your course of action removing the pargraph that was included in the final draft.

We have not made such decision for removal

One participant who was not attending the 16 Sept later on did not like the language but he did not proposed its removal

Moreover, based on comments reveived after the meeting you were not authorized to unilaterlly remove a paragraph which was included -

If the language in that pargraph to be softened , I am reay to discuss that but not unilateral removal of the full paragraph.

Your authority is limited to conduc the meeting but bnot to decide for evry b ody.

Pls immediate re insert that pargraph and either redicuss it or send it to CCWG Plenary

Regards

Kavouss

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Greg
Tks for the doc.
Surprisingly I saw that that you have unilaterally removed the last paragraph that I have added and commented by Paul Rosenweig
As I mentioned we can soften the langauge such as replacement of "MUST" by "should" as well as few other area to soften the language but I do not agree that you reomove that entire paragraph since somebody did not like that.
This is a multistakeholder approach and view of everybody must be taken into account.
Consequently there is no consensus in the draft you have declared as finalized pls reconsider the matter.
Regards
kvouss

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,

I have attached a further revised OFAC Recommendation, reflecting changes suggested by Kavouss Arasteh and Seun Ojedeji. Word and PDF versions are attached, and the Google Doc reflects these suggested changes as well.

I look forward to our call.

Best regards,

Greg

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction