Jeff, I think your question is a good one.  I think you may be using DNS in a more narrow way than the drafter intended, but we should clarify this (which may mean revising the question somewhat).  I would say that DNS was being used here to mean "domain name-related services," and not merely "DNS services" of the type that could be offered by a "DNS service provider" -- but your reading is a logical one and others could take the same approach, which would muddy the effort considerably.

Milton and Christopher, can you answer Jeff's question below?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> wrote:

I think I support this formulation, but can you please define what DNS-related services are.  If I missed this in a previous thread, I apologize.  But 90% of DNS-related services (in my opinion) are non-ICANN related (services like managed external DNS, internal DNS management, DDoS protection services, etc.)…..Those examples have very little if anything to do with ICANN.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA

1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600

Mclean, VA 22102, United States

E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com

T: +1.703.635.7514

M: +1.202.549.5079

@Jintlaw

 

 

From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 10:20 PM
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Cc: ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Third Draft of Experience Solicitation Questions

 

I support this formulation, thanks.


Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087

 

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

All:

 

Based on discussions on our last call and the list, I've revised these questions as follows (added text underlined).  Please reply to this email with any comments or suggested changes.

 

Greg

 

1.       Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase DNS-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way?

 

If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents.  Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects.

 

2.       Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?

 

If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents.    Please note that “affected” may refer to positive and/or negative effects.

 

3.       Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above?

 

If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.

 

_____________________________

 

*  For these questions, “ICANN’s jurisdiction” refers to (a) ICANN being subject to U.S. and California law as a result of its incorporation and location in California, (b) ICANN being subject to the laws of any other country as a result of its location or contacts with that country, or (c) any “choice of law” or venue provisions in agreements with ICANN.  

 


_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction