Thanks David, excellent work as usual.

Given the outstanding public attention given to this case, and the level of discomfort it created in many ICANN circles, including this group, I would find it appropriate to note the “non-legal” impact. To remain as fact-based as possible, we could mention something like :

“As a result of the litigation (and the previous IRP), the .africa application (as one instance of implementation of ICANN’s policy) suffered significant delay.”

Best

Mathieu

De : ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] De la part de McAuley, David
Envoyé : mardi 28 février 2017 15:20
À : ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
Objet : [Ws2-jurisdiction] Two litigation reviews

Seeing Mathieu’s mail just now reminded me that I was to send my litigation reviews (2 so far) to list.

Attached are two reviews in one document – DCA v. ICANN (Trial court) and DCA v. ICANN (Appellate Court).

Best regards

David

David McAuley

International Policy Manager

Verisign Inc.

703-948-4154