Thanks for this Greg, useful for sometime like me who have mainly been following the list.

It seem to me that item 2 of appendix A is main point that needs to addressed and if some of the responses to that implies changing the status quo then it should be logged and consensus check be made on such alternate options.

Regards

On 12 Jun 2017 7:08 AM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

All,

Based on our call last week, I've reviewed the captioning transcript and chat transcript and pulled out the various formulations of different positions on the Subgroup's scope and focus. I've edited some of the statements for clarity and written vs. oral presentation, but endeavored not to change the meaning in any case.

The attached document has three charts (Scope, Focus, Immunity Question). In each chart, each column represents a significantly different approach to the issue. Within each column, the statements are largely similar, but do have some difference that will need to be resolved.

Ideally, we will be able to come to consensus on an approach for each of these issues.

I've also attached a revised copy of the transcript. I found significant gaps and mistranscriptions, so I listened to the MP3 and corrected a number of errors.

Please review and respond.

Greg

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction