Per Greg’s request, regarding the 6 Notes in the final draft doc:

I enthusiastically support Notes 1-3.

Note 4: I do not understand the justification to single-out one comment (that of France) among so many that we received and considered. Pending an explanation of that justification, I would not support a note that calls attention to just one comment.

Note 5:  Support

Note 6: Support (but please ensure that it reflects the edit to one Stress Test that was offered on our last call.  I was driving and did not write it down!)

Thanks,

Steve

From: Ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 1:18 AM
To: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>
Subject: [Ws2-jurisdiction] FINAL DRAFT REVISED REPORT OF JURISDICTION SUBGROUP

All,

The final draft of the revised Jurisdiction Subgroup report is attached for your review.  The Google doc version is at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdMJyvZdyN9TApT6gx_3NwpdvIL7YKHEUD7tNfLf6hU/edit?usp=sharing

PLEASE SPECIFICALLY REVIEW THE SIX "NOTES" IN THE MARGINAL COMMENTS.  THESE SHOW WHERE POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THE REPORT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED AND TENTATIVELY RESOLVED.

PLEASE RESPOND WITH YOUR POSITION ON THESE SIX NOTES, PARTICULARLY IF YOU OBJECT TO THE RESOLUTION IN THE BODY OF THE REPORT. (Expressions of support are welcome, but not necessary.  Lack of response will be interpreted as "Can live with it.")

THIS IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT IF YOU WILL NOT BE ON WEDNESDAY'S CALL, SO YOUR VOICE CAN BE HEARD. The Report must be submitted to the Plenary no later than Friday, March 2 (two days after our call).

Thank you for your review.

Best regards,

Greg