Dear Leon
Dear Greg
Thank you very much for your support for Greg and lack of even partial support to my rights as a participant to this Group to ask that written answers be given to my questions raised pursuant to the list of questions published by Greg
I do not understand what is wrong with asking such legitimates request i.e.
There were a list of questions
Some of them were answered, some of them were not answered.
Those answered required to be supported by written answers to better understand that
What is wrong deal Leon, Pls without getting in philosophical argument, please clearly REPLY
What is wrong with that request ?
Why the group should approve that written answers given to my questions?
The majority of this group composed of those that do not want any change to the existing situation while minority have serious difficulties with some of the existing arrangements .
Dear Leon,
Do you believe that Greg is authorized by CCWG to stop this minority to express their views. Too ask questions to ask answers to their question verbally or in written form?
I do not understand you’re rational not to address this clear question
What is the problem that a written answer be given to questions of substance when raised and demanded.
Why there is a need that the group should approve such a need
The need to answer raised by the people behind the questions and NOT THE GROUP.
I would appropriate to receive answers.
By the way there were support to provide written answers to my questions raised
Moreover, other questions raised in the attachment provided by Greg WERE NOT EVEN DISCUSSED NOTR ANSWERED.
They must be answered.
By the way, there are a very small minority that categorically disagree with me irrespective the substance of the issue as they act with hostility
I certainly disapprove their unexpected behavior and DOT CARE OF THEIR SYSTEMATIC OBJECTION .See support to Greg .
In summary, Dear Leon, Dear Greg and Dear Sam;
I need written answers to my questions in addition to the transcript which are not formal ALL
Best Regards
Kavouss
Dear Leon,Thank you very much for your support for Greg and lack of even partial support to my rights as a participant to this Group to ask that written answers be given to my questions raised pursuant to the list of questions published by GregI do not understand what is wrong with asking such légitimâtes reqOn Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:It's hard to express this without sounding myself as if I'm being slightly disrespectful, for which I apologise to Kavouss in advance.
However it seems to me that all his shrill complaints are simply straight out of one of the chapters in Negotiation and International Diplomacy 101 amd we shouldn't take them to heart, just like a pre-flop bet in Texas Hold 'Em.
As I've said before, I always feel it is a pleasure to watch how the game is played in the majors.
Nigel
PS: I do think that Greg is not being unfair, merely attempting to promote collegiality, which is a noble aim. If we all considered the question "how can we work together" rather than the "I want" then I believe progress will be enhanced.
>
> In particular, I want to publicly defend Greg against any claim that he
> is “not acting properly” or that his behavior is either “unprecedented”
> or “unacceptable” or “unfair.”_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction