Two issues about the OFAC doc:
First is a question, I understand that a general licence is given for a particular sanction regime, say against X country. There is no provision for a general licence that is standing, for a particular class of activities (DNS related) and/ or a particular set or class of actors (ICANN) that would automatically apply to every sanction regimes, including new ones.
If indeed this be true, then there is no one time guarantee and exemption that can be given to ICANN from OFAC, even if the US administration be inclined to do so. ICANN have to keep asking for exemptions under every new OFAC sanction regime, without any guarantee that it will be given such exempting general license. Am I correct?
Second: It surprises me that there is no will here even to recommend that ICANN does ask for a general licence of exemption for a given sanction regime, only that it studies its processes, possibilities, etc.
This convinces me that the way many,
including the chair, look at what the mandate and purpose of
this group is and what I take it to be are quite different.
People here seem to think that they should only given such
recommendations that US gov is highly likely to accept, and if
the likelihood is less than very high it is best to first
explore such likelihood before proceeding further. And only to
proceed if such high likelihood can be found.
This to me is very disparaging to the authority of this group, and its members, which is supposed to be working on the behalf of the global public and not of the US administration, as an advisory group to it. I resent such devaluation of this group, and its mandate and authority (which comes from its legitimacy of representing the interests of the global public). I take the mandate and responsibility of the group to be to recommend practical and sufficiently appropriate means that makes ICANN accountable to all the global public and not just the US public, through the jurisdiction of the US state.
parminder
All,
As mentioned on the Plenary Call, the attached first draft recommendation regarding OFAC, assembled from the input of various participants, will be reviewed on the Subgroup call.
The Agenda will be amended accordingly.
I look forward to comments from the Subgroup.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction