Greg
Shatan
C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc@gmail.com
Tijani,That's a good point and something we have been meaning to confirm. I will add a question on that subject.GregGreg Shatan
C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc@gmail.comOn Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn> wrote:Greg and Mathieu,I noticed that among the questions, there is nothing about the jurisdiction of contracts between ICANN and another party who is not based in one of the locations that you mentioned (registry based in France for example).Can you add a question about that?------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- Tijani BEN JEMAAExecutive DirectorMediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)Phone: +216 98 330 114------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- Le 21 févr. 2017 à 17:55, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> a écrit :______________________________Thanks Greg,I expect that ICANN legal might ask us some clarifying questions about the question, but it would be good to engage in this dialogue.As a demonstration that we also did our homework on the issue, it might be worth noting that the ICANN litigation documents (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/litigation ) web page mentions :-en - Several cases of litigations in US States out of California- One case of litigation outside of the US only (the Pool.com case (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/litigation which never lead to a formal court order, but within which ICANN seems to have argued against the choice of jurisdiction. I should also note that ICANN’s arguments were related to the specific circumstances of the case, and not necessarily applicable to other potential cases)-en BestMathieuDe : ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org ] De la part de Greg Shatan
Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 04:58
À : ws2-jurisdiction
Objet : [Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN LegalAll,Here is a revised version of the questions for ICANN legal, with the previous changes accepted and new changes based on our last call shown in track changes.Please reply if you have any questions or comments, or if you believe these are now ready to forward to the CCWG's legal committee.Thanks!GregGreg Shatan
C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc@gmail.com_________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction