Bernie and All,

That is correct.  This week's call is Thursday 8 June at 13:00.  A calendar invite was sent out on May 23.

Greg

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> wrote:
Re schedule

The next Jurisdiction call is noted on the master calendar as Thursday 8 June 1300 which was confirmed with a calendar invite.

Greg could you please advise if this is incorrect.

Thanks

B.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:57 AM, CW Mail <mail@christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
Good afternoon:

Returning from four days off-line in Edinburgh, I find that the schedule is problematic.

1.      My Calendar has this down for Thursday, 13.00 UTC.

2.      That was confirmed during the most recent call on Tusday 30 May: Point 8.1 of the Agenda.

3.      Unless I am mistaken, we have not yet received the Staff announcement of Calls for the week of 5 June.

Regards

CW



On 04 Jun 2017, at 23:39, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> I wanted to provide advance notice that we will pick up the discussion of the Subgroup's Mandate and Scope on Tuesday's call, with the goal of settling the issue over this call and the next. After all, we need to know what our mandate is in order to know if we ar fulfilling it. Some notes:
>
> 1. It's not up to the Subgroup to define the Subgroup's mandate and Scope. This has been done in the foundational documents -- Charter. WS 1 Report and Transition Bylaw. What we need to do is clarify our understanding of that mandate and Scope.
>
> 2. As such, the foundational documents need to form both the basis and the boundary of any such clarification or proposal for clarification. These documents were excerpted in my "straw man" mandate document sent around in the last few weeks.
>
> 3. Mandate and Scope (defined in these documents) need to be distinguished from potential issues participants might raise. Such issues, by and large, are not mentioned in the foundational documents.
>
> 4. The Mandate and Scope will be used to determine if any potential issue is "in scope".
>
> 5. Discussions of the issue on the list in advance of the call will be most helpful, since the call is only an hour.
>
> 6. While some have said we have gone in circles on this issue, or avoided resolving it. The goal here and now is to avoid that fate, whatever the outcome might be.
>
> Finally, I request broad participation on this issue, even if you have given up on this subject of discussion.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction

_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction