[Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Meeting-20170301 Agenda and Materials
All, The next meeting of the Jurisdiction sub-group will be 1 March 1300UTC. Please find below and attached the agenda for the meeting. Related materials are also attached. Please read the case summaries and be prepared to discuss these at the meeting as these are central to our current work. There are 5 of these (thanks to Mathieu Weill and David McAuley for these) but they are only 1 pagers. Looking forward to our call. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 for Greg Shatan - Rapporteur Jurisdiction Sub-Group =============== CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2 Jurisdiction Subgroup, Meeting #22 March 1, 2017, 13:00 UTC AGENDA 1. Welcome 2. Review of Agenda 3. Administration (5 minutes) 3.1. Questions to ICANN Legal – Status of Legal Committee 3.2. Hypotheticals document – Propose suspending the work until ICANN Legal responds to the questions. 3.3. “Influence of ICANN’s Existing Jurisdiction” document – Propose suspending the work until this group completes the review of ICANN’s past and current litigation which will inform the development of that document. 4. Questionnaire Update (20 minutes) 4.1. Method for processing responses 4.1.1. Rolling review of responses – Propose new responses to the questionnaire to be reviewed by the Jurisdiction sub-group at each meeting. 4.1.2. Proposal for a review team – Propose review team will be responsible for updating the sub-group on new responses and their status at each meeting as well as elaborating an evaluation framework for responses, for approval by the sub-group, based on the responses received. 4.1.3. Selection of the review team 4.2. Review of current responses in tool (document) 5. Review of ICANN’s Past and Current Litigation (30 minutes) 5.1. Review of Sign-up sheet (document) 5.2. Verisign, Inc. v. ICANN V2 – MW (document) 5.3. State of Arizona vs NTIA V2 - MW (document) 5.4. Ben Haim v. Iran…. – MW (document) 5.5. DCA v. ICANN - DM (document) 5.6. DCA V. ICANN – Appellate Court - DM (document) 5.7. Review of summary sheet template (document) 6. AOB
Dear all, Please accept my apologies for missing this meeting as it overlaps with the IGF Open Consultations taking place in Geneva. Kind regards Jorge Von: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Bernard Turcotte Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 16:26 An: ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org Betreff: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Meeting-20170301 Agenda and Materials All, The next meeting of the Jurisdiction sub-group will be 1 March 1300UTC. Please find below and attached the agenda for the meeting. Related materials are also attached. Please read the case summaries and be prepared to discuss these at the meeting as these are central to our current work. There are 5 of these (thanks to Mathieu Weill and David McAuley for these) but they are only 1 pagers. Looking forward to our call. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 for Greg Shatan - Rapporteur Jurisdiction Sub-Group =============== CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2 Jurisdiction Subgroup, Meeting #22 March 1, 2017, 13:00 UTC AGENDA 1. Welcome 2. Review of Agenda 3. Administration (5 minutes) 3.1. Questions to ICANN Legal – Status of Legal Committee 3.2. Hypotheticals document – Propose suspending the work until ICANN Legal responds to the questions. 3.3. “Influence of ICANN’s Existing Jurisdiction” document – Propose suspending the work until this group completes the review of ICANN’s past and current litigation which will inform the development of that document. 4. Questionnaire Update (20 minutes) 4.1. Method for processing responses 4.1.1. Rolling review of responses – Propose new responses to the questionnaire to be reviewed by the Jurisdiction sub-group at each meeting. 4.1.2. Proposal for a review team – Propose review team will be responsible for updating the sub-group on new responses and their status at each meeting as well as elaborating an evaluation framework for responses, for approval by the sub-group, based on the responses received. 4.1.3. Selection of the review team 4.2. Review of current responses in tool (document) 5. Review of ICANN’s Past and Current Litigation (30 minutes) 5.1. Review of Sign-up sheet (document) 5.2. Verisign, Inc. v. ICANN V2 – MW (document) 5.3. State of Arizona vs NTIA V2 - MW (document) 5.4. Ben Haim v. Iran…. – MW (document) 5.5. DCA v. ICANN - DM (document) 5.6. DCA V. ICANN – Appellate Court - DM (document) 5.7. Review of summary sheet template (document) 6. AOB
participants (2)
-
Bernard Turcotte -
Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch