Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] OFAC Recommendation: Postponing Submission to Plenary
Hello Greg, When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly? Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote: All, There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation. In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary. Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear. Thank you. Greg _______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
It is in the marked version of the document sent around yesterday. It is also in the previous version of the Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h9xCMjxmKDEHj2aD5d4xDEhIddAR0iId5Uer6nLh... (it was deleted from the latest version of the Google Doc). Finally it is in the email exchange with Kavouss earlier today. Greg On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Greg,
When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly?
Regards
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation.
In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary.
Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear.
Thank you.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Dear Greg, May you pls kindly, whenever, you post a text as Google doc. make it avaialbe as a word doc. as well I have had and continue to have access to Google doc. Awaiting your doc. as word Regards Kavouss On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
It is in the marked version of the document sent around yesterday. It is also in the previous version of the Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1h9xCMjxmKDEHj2aD5d4xDEhIddAR0iId5Uer6nLh_PI/edit?usp=sharing (it was deleted from the latest version of the Google Doc). Finally it is in the email exchange with Kavouss earlier today.
Greg
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Greg,
When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly?
Regards
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation.
In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary.
Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear.
Thank you.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Dear Greg, Thank you very much.for the message.$ I am again surprised that you confused me and poerhaps othets.$ After your last message yesterday 21 Sept that the first two paragraphs of the added text by me may not fit , I proposed you another alternative to direcly include t various elements of the added text in pertinent part of the existing text . I have considerably softened the text However, you did not either read nor having any willing to consider that. Pls note that you are kindly requested to take account of the modified texts and suggested the way on how take various element of that into account and send a revised version.$ Regards Tks Kavouss On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Greg, May you pls kindly, whenever, you post a text as Google doc. make it avaialbe as a word doc. as well I have had and continue to have access to Google doc. Awaiting your doc. as word Regards Kavouss
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
It is in the marked version of the document sent around yesterday. It is also in the previous version of the Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h9xCMjxmKDEHj2aD5d4xD EhIddAR0iId5Uer6nLh_PI/edit?usp=sharing (it was deleted from the latest version of the Google Doc). Finally it is in the email exchange with Kavouss earlier today.
Greg
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Greg,
When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly?
Regards
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation.
In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary.
Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear.
Thank you.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Kavouss, I responded to your suggestions a few minutes before your latest email. I could not do so earlier, due to work obligations and religious observances. I have distributed Word and PDF updates daily (nightly here) since our Monday call and will do so again momentarily. Best regards, Greg On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Greg, Thank you very much.for the message.$ I am again surprised that you confused me and poerhaps othets.$ After your last message yesterday 21 Sept that the first two paragraphs of the added text by me may not fit , I proposed you another alternative to direcly include t various elements of the added text in pertinent part of the existing text . I have considerably softened the text However, you did not either read nor having any willing to consider that. Pls note that you are kindly requested to take account of the modified texts and suggested the way on how take various element of that into account and send a revised version.$ Regards Tks Kavouss
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Greg, May you pls kindly, whenever, you post a text as Google doc. make it avaialbe as a word doc. as well I have had and continue to have access to Google doc. Awaiting your doc. as word Regards Kavouss
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
It is in the marked version of the document sent around yesterday. It is also in the previous version of the Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h9xCMjxmKDEHj2aD5d4xD EhIddAR0iId5Uer6nLh_PI/edit?usp=sharing (it was deleted from the latest version of the Google Doc). Finally it is in the email exchange with Kavouss earlier today.
Greg
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Greg,
When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly?
Regards
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation.
In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary.
Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear.
Thank you.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Happy religious holidays Pls kindly look at my further messages Sorry to disturbing you during your holidays. Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Sep 2017, at 09:25, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Kavouss,
I responded to your suggestions a few minutes before your latest email. I could not do so earlier, due to work obligations and religious observances.
I have distributed Word and PDF updates daily (nightly here) since our Monday call and will do so again momentarily.
Best regards,
Greg
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Greg, Thank you very much.for the message.$ I am again surprised that you confused me and poerhaps othets.$ After your last message yesterday 21 Sept that the first two paragraphs of the added text by me may not fit , I proposed you another alternative to direcly include t various elements of the added text in pertinent part of the existing text . I have considerably softened the text However, you did not either read nor having any willing to consider that. Pls note that you are kindly requested to take account of the modified texts and suggested the way on how take various element of that into account and send a revised version.$ Regards Tks Kavouss
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Greg, May you pls kindly, whenever, you post a text as Google doc. make it avaialbe as a word doc. as well I have had and continue to have access to Google doc. Awaiting your doc. as word Regards Kavouss
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote: It is in the marked version of the document sent around yesterday. It is also in the previous version of the Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h9xCMjxmKDEHj2aD5d4xDEhIddAR0iId5Uer6nLh... (it was deleted from the latest version of the Google Doc). Finally it is in the email exchange with Kavouss earlier today.
Greg
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote: Hello Greg,
When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly?
Regards
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote: All,
There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation.
In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary.
Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear.
Thank you.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Kavouss, As previously noted, I have responded in detail (twice) regarding the remaining elements of your suggested text. Please read these responses. I assure you it will take far less time to read them than it took me to write them. Please reply to the points raised in these responses if you have any remaining concerns. Best regards, Greg On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Happy religious holidays Pls kindly look at my further messages Sorry to disturbing you during your holidays.
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Sep 2017, at 09:25, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Kavouss,
I responded to your suggestions a few minutes before your latest email. I could not do so earlier, due to work obligations and religious observances.
I have distributed Word and PDF updates daily (nightly here) since our Monday call and will do so again momentarily.
Best regards,
Greg
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Greg, Thank you very much.for the message.$ I am again surprised that you confused me and poerhaps othets.$ After your last message yesterday 21 Sept that the first two paragraphs of the added text by me may not fit , I proposed you another alternative to direcly include t various elements of the added text in pertinent part of the existing text . I have considerably softened the text However, you did not either read nor having any willing to consider that. Pls note that you are kindly requested to take account of the modified texts and suggested the way on how take various element of that into account and send a revised version.$ Regards Tks Kavouss
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Kavouss Arasteh < kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Greg, May you pls kindly, whenever, you post a text as Google doc. make it avaialbe as a word doc. as well I have had and continue to have access to Google doc. Awaiting your doc. as word Regards Kavouss
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
It is in the marked version of the document sent around yesterday. It is also in the previous version of the Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h9xCMjxmKDEHj2aD5d4xD EhIddAR0iId5Uer6nLh_PI/edit?usp=sharing (it was deleted from the latest version of the Google Doc). Finally it is in the email exchange with Kavouss earlier today.
Greg
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Greg,
When you say "this text" what/where are they exactly?
Regards
Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Sep 20, 2017 8:53 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
All,
There is some recently suggested text that is still being advanced for possible inclusion in this recommendation.
In order to give those supporting this suggested text a greater opportunity to respond to concerns raised about this text, and to avoid even the appearance of a "unilateral decision" (either to include or exclude the text),I have reluctantly concluded that we should postpone submitting this recommendation to the upcoming plenary.
Please review this discussion and indicate your position on this text and/or make suggestions for revisions that might garner greater support for the text. If you support some version of any or all of this text ,please also indicate where it should go in the document, since that is not clear.
Thank you.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
participants (4)
-
Arasteh -
Greg Shatan -
Kavouss Arasteh
-
Seun Ojedeji