Jurisdiction Subgroup: Agenda for Meeting #11 at 13:00 UTC today
Dear all, Please find attached the agenda for today's subgroup meeting at 13:00 UTC. Below are links to the two documents we have been working on, for ease of reference. 1. "What is the influence of ICANN’s existing jurisdiction(s) relating to resolution of disputes (i.e., choice of law and venue) on the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?" - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_uxN8A5J3iaofnGlr5gYoFVKudgg_ DuwDgIuyICPzbk/edit?usp=sharing 2. "Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction" document: https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1oE9xDIAJhr4Nx7vNO_mWotSXuUtTgJMRs6U92yTgOH4/edit?usp=sharing I'm also taking the liberty of pasting below the reformulated “experience” questions referenced in the agenda, which Greg had sent via email about 8 hours ago. Regards, Vinay & Greg ---------------- *1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase DNS-related services, been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way?* *If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “effects” may be positive or negative.* *2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?* *If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “effects” may be positive or negative.* *3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above?* *If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.* *_____________________________* ** For these questions, “ICANN’s jurisdiction” refers to (a) ICANN being subject to U.S. and California law as a result of its incorporation and location in California, (b) ICANN being subject to the laws of any other country as a result of its location or contacts with that country, or (c) any “choice of law” or venue provisions in agreements with ICANN. *
Sorry, I’m on a meeting abroad. I apologize for not being able to attend ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114 +216 52 385 114 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 29 nov. 2016 à 11:54, Vinay Kesari <vinay.kesari@gmail.com> a écrit :
Dear all,
Please find attached the agenda for today's subgroup meeting at 13:00 UTC.
Below are links to the two documents we have been working on, for ease of reference.
1. "What is the influence of ICANN’s existing jurisdiction(s) relating to resolution of disputes (i.e., choice of law and venue) on the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?" - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_uxN8A5J3iaofnGlr5gYoFVKudgg_DuwDgIuyICP... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_uxN8A5J3iaofnGlr5gYoFVKudgg_DuwDgIuyICP...>
2. "Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction" document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oE9xDIAJhr4Nx7vNO_mWotSXuUtTgJMRs6U92yTg... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oE9xDIAJhr4Nx7vNO_mWotSXuUtTgJMRs6U92yTg...>
I'm also taking the liberty of pasting below the reformulated “experience” questions referenced in the agenda, which Greg had sent via email about 8 hours ago.
Regards,
Vinay & Greg
----------------
1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase DNS-related services, been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any way?
If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “effects” may be positive or negative.
2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents. Please note that “effects” may be positive or negative.
3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any reports of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions above?
If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.
_____________________________
* For these questions, “ICANN’s jurisdiction” refers to (a) ICANN being subject to U.S. and California law as a result of its incorporation and location in California, (b) ICANN being subject to the laws of any other country as a result of its location or contacts with that country, or (c) any “choice of law” or venue provisions in agreements with ICANN.
<Jurisdiction Meeting #11 Agenda.docx><Jurisdiction Meeting #11 Agenda.pdf>_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
participants (2)
-
Tijani BEN JEMAA -
Vinay Kesari