Milton, ​The NTIA requirements layer is in Annex 12, so that is one reason it has carried over onto this list. We need to clarify what the NTIA requirements regarding jurisdiction were, in order to discuss the relevance of this layer. However, as a general matter, I believe the NTIA requirements were not merely "Day 1" requirements, but were requirements relating to what a "post-transition" ICANN should be. On your second point (and indeed, on your first) please contribute to the Google doc, which by its nature is a collaborative project. Greg On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:

Sorry I was unable to participate in the call this morning.

I am puzzled by the “NTIA requirements” layer. I thought the transition planned had been deemed to meet those requirements and the authority of NTIA was finished. Also, Jean-Jacques’s classification of state law (California) as part of federal requirements is incorrect. California is not part of the federal government.

Dr. Milton L Mueller

Professor, School of Public Policy <http://spp.gatech.edu/>

Georgia Institute of Technology

Internet Governance Project

http://internetgovernance.org/

*From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction- bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Greg Shatan *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 10:18 AM *To:* ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org *Subject:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction - Google Doc

All,

As promised on today's call, I have created a Google Doc version of the slide discussed on today's call. Please add your comments and suggestions to the Google Doc.

The link is here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oE9xDIAJhr4Nx7vNO_ mWotSXuUtTgJMRs6U92yTgOH4/edit?usp=sharing

Please let me know if you have any issues accessing the document.

Greg