Thanks Avri...   does the job for me...   just check the formatting here though  =>  "....one o*f* the
    accountabilitymechanisms
​... ..."​


On 31 August 2017 at 06:41, avri doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,

I added some text to the bullet on the 4 person panel.

**

  * *

    In some situations, issues may be complex and require cooperation
    among several of the ICANN accountabilitymechanisms. An example
    might be a complaint about fairness filed by one or more parts of
    the empowered community. Another example might involve situations
    among the Board, Community and/or Organization that repeat regularly
    and are not susceptible to redress by any one o*f* the
    accountabilitymechanisms.  ICANN should investigate the creation*of*
    an informal four-member panel composed of the Ombudsman, the
    Complaints Officer, a representative chosen by the  Empowered
    Community and a Board member.   The panel could will review concerns
    or issues raised by the community, ombudsman, staff or board that at
    least two panel members determine require further effort. While this
    panel should work transparently, it will, at its discretion, be able
    to treat issues that require it, as confidential. This panel would
    have no powers beyond those of its members and their ability to
    cooperate.

    *

*

*<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vH5su7SDGE0i_rTstbYJ7tIaOFuRnV4dfqpwMTPoYa8/edit?usp=sharing>
*(pdf attached)*
*

Thanks

*avri*

*


_______________________________________________
Ws2-staff_acct mailing list
Ws2-staff_acct@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-staff_acct