Thanks Avri!
example:
<Question>
Are all this functions performed by staff working at arms length form each other, so as to avoid conflicts???? Are each of these staff groups free to make their own best decisions without interference from the others?
What do you think?
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 21 Oct 2016, at 8:02, avri doria wrote:
Hi,Thanks for the comment.I have no clarity on what you mean by :down to earth “organizational conditions”And what question are you suggesting? Can you suggest text for a newquestion, either as a new question or suggest and edit to an existingquestion.thanksavriOn 21-Oct-16 08:43, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:Thank you Avri.I still miss the down to earth “organizational conditions” in whichStaff works, and the fact that some parts or divisions of ICANN maycome to different conclusions of what the best interest of the wholecommunity is. ICANN has different roles and one of the areas ofpossible conflict i still miss in the document is conflicts ofinterested “between” those area of ICANN and how they will be solvedso part of the Staff does not fall into those conflicts.CheersCarlos Raúl Gutiérrez+506 8837 7176Skype: carlos.raulgCurrent UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)On 21 Oct 2016, at 1:26, avri doria wrote:Hi,This is coming to you at the last minute.We are required to submit a status report, according to a template, forthe Hyderabad meeting.Jordan and I have put one together. We need to submit by end ofbusiness Friday 21 Oct in CA headquarters time (i.e. today).The draft, open to comment, can be found in:A pdf is attached.I plan to finalize the report later today.thanksavri---This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software._______________________________________________Ws2-staff_acct mailing listWs2-staff_acct@icann.org---This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software._______________________________________________Ws2-staff_acct mailing listWs2-staff_acct@icann.org