In subsequent revisions the text may also have to aim to call for greater trust by the governments in the multistakehokder model, institutions and processes that should be able to address the challenges and tasks ahead in Internet Governance far more effectively and swiftly when supported differently
with understanding.On Thu, 27 Jun, 2024, 18:04 Israel Rosas via wsis20, <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi Fiona,
Thanks! I agree with the general positives of the Internet Governance portions. Perhaps I’m nitpicking, but the phrasing for Article 27 is still concerning in recognizing multilateral and multistakeholder “approaches to Internet Governance” when perhaps “processes related to Internet Governance” would’ve been better.
On the other hand, it’s interesting to see the suggestion to the IGF to establish an annual policy discussion track.
Best,
Isra
Israel Rosas, Director, Partnerships and Internet Development
Donate today.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.