Hi All,

While a lot of the text in the Zero draft is Developing country friendly, I echo Jorge's concern of limiting the Role of IGF and  multistakeholder cooperation only to the"   governance, content, and technical layers" and trying to create the High-Level Review of the Global Digital Compact, rather than used existing mechanism such as IGF, CSTD and UN mechanisms as proposed by many.

Additionally the role of Multistakeholders  seems problematic, especially the text " ...cooperation will involve all stakeholders, according to their respective mandates, functions and competencies"" This at times can be used to sideline stakeholders especially Civil Society.

Regards,

Amrita



On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 12:22, Hickson, Nigel (DSIT) via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Jorge

Good morning for posting and for Observations; clearly work for us all to do and will demonstrate value of this list;

Best

Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: wsis20 <wsis20-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Jorge.Cancio--- via wsis20
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 6:59 AM
To: jordan.carter@auda.org.au; wsis20@icann.org
Subject: Re: [wsis20] GDC zero draft

Thanks Jordan: key are paras 61 to 64 which establish an entirely new follow-up process, which most probably would attract all attention  on digital governance issues, and de facto would render existing processes (such as IGF) quite disempowered...

There is as well a narrative of clustering the IGF and Internet governance as a merely technical matter, which is not pertinent to other aspects of the GDC (see Paras 25:26 and how they stand v-a-v the rest)...

just some first personal impressions...

Jorge

________________________________

Von: Jordan Carter via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org>
Datum: 2. April 2024 um 01:28:06 MESZ
An: ICANN wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org>
Betreff: [wsis20] GDC zero draft

Hi all

This now appears to have been released:

https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/Global_Digital_Compact_Zero_Draft.pdf

On a quick first read, the role of the technical community has been recognised, and the follow up process proposed is through existing mechanisms, not a new Digital Cooperation Forum.

Those seem to be wins.

Cheers
Jordan

Jordan Carter
Internet Governance and Policy Director

.au Domain Administration

_______________________________________________
wsis20 mailing list
wsis20@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wsis20

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
wsis20 mailing list
wsis20@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wsis20

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.