"Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution vests Congress, and by extension the Executive and Judicial branches of our government, with the authority to engage in relations with the tribes, thereby firmly placing tribes within the constitutional fabric of our nation. When the governmental authority of tribes was first challenged in the 1830's, U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall articulated the fundamental principle that has guidPed the evolution of federal Indian law to the present: That tribes possess a nationhood status and retain inherent powers of self-government." (emphasis added)
Please advise if you have any ideas for inclusion moving forward as I know you are on the IMSB! (congrats!)
Hi Ann,
Thanks for the feedback.
For clarity, do you mean, for example, that the indigenous people make
decisions for their defence, foreign affairs, and currency, among
others? Does the sovereignty recognition imply that they operate
independently of the country within which they're recognised?
Thanks.
Jimson
Member of the IMSB
On 2025-07-28 03:22, Anne ICANN via wsis20 wrote:
> Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the
> July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the
> effort!
>
> Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to
> "engagement at the sub-national level" which mentions indigenous
> communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot
> be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are
> recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian
> Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may
> take a different, more generalized approach.)
>
> I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements
> Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by
> Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN
> Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted
> below again for convenience.)
>
> Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to
> the session on Tuesday!
> Anne
>
> FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES:
> 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the
> participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and
> institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues
> affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the
> Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth
> sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous
> Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the
> world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible
> measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’
> representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United
> Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of
> Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in
> that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United
> Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous
> Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the
> world as an input to the intergovernmental process;
>
> Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor
> NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026
> anneicanngnso@gmail.com
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal
>> Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
>>
>> It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the
>> priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of
>> non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over
>> the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it
>> attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that
>> those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to
>> replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper,
>> and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful,
>> multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months.
>> We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete
>> proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20
>> review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA
>> WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Jen on behalf of the
>> IMSB_______________________________________________
>>
>> Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant
>> resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
>>
>> Read the public archives for this mailing list:
>> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
>> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>> Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>> delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>> and so on.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant
> resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
>
> Read the public archives for this mailing list:
> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link
> above to change your membership status or configuration, including
> unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
> altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.