Dear Eberhard, If I am not mistaken you are already part of the legal sub-team through its mailing list. If that is not the case, I will be glad to ask staff to have you subscribed to the list. Best regards, León
El 20/04/2015, a las 9:12, Dr Eberhard Lisse <el@lisse.NA> escribió:
Dear Co-Chairs,
I remain confused by Thomas' advice.
From the charter:
The Chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each position as having one of the following designations:
a) Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees; identified by an absence of objection
b) Consensus - a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree
I quite doubt that we shall need advice from our legal SubTeam what EACH POSITION means.
[...] In the absence of Full Consensus, the Chair(s) should allow for the submission of minority viewpoint(s) and these, along with the consensus view, shall be included in the report. [...]
I quite doubt that we shall need advice from our legal SubTeam whether an interim report is a report.
Oh, this reminds me, I want to join the Legal SubTeam.
greetings, el
On 2015-04-20 14:54, Thomas Rickert wrote:
Dear Eberhard, it is not foreseen in our charter to have minority views for other scenarios than the consensus recommendations. I suggest you use the public comment period to voice your concerns or indicate your preference where our report is providing options as I am sure many of the colleagues in the CCWG and their respective groups will do.
Thomas
--- rickert.net <http://rickert.net> [...] -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community