Good evening:
Could we take this offline … ?
Well, No. I love Phil's postings, but not as an ...
... independent on behalf of the CCWG Accountability.
Perhaps we could start with published minutes of the
… subgroup meeting in Dublin.
OK? CW On 29 Oct 2015, at 19:13, Phil Buckingham <phil@dotadvice.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Bruce, Fellow Board Members, Fadi, Co Chairs,
As a fellow CFO, I think Xavier, under Fadi's leadership, has made huge strides in ICANN's financial reporting and its underlying financial processes. However I agree with you,Bruce that there is still a long long way to go.
Dare I mention $60M gTLD auction proceeds and the $89.3 M "remaining balance" re new GTLDs as per the FY16 Operating Plan & Budget. Added to the fact, actual new gTLD registrations are 50% below budget . This concerns me enormously , particularly regarding the budget veto issue. Following the subgroup meeting in Dublin (that included Cherine, Asha, Xavier, Jonathan Z, Ray and myself ) Xavier has been tasked with building up the non discretionary / discretionary budgetary expenditure escalation ladder re the budget veto. This is a hugely complex task. Could we take this offline to discuss for me, working at ICANN, to shadow / work with Xavier as an independent on behalf of the CCWG Accountability.
Thanks,
Phil
Phil Buckingham -----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin Sent: 29 October 2015 12:17 To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Contribution on Transparency Reforms for CCWG
Hello Greg,
6333. The accounting books and records and minutes of proceedings of the members and the board and committees of the board shall be open to inspection upon the written demand on the corporation of any member at any reasonable time, for a purpose reasonably related to such person's interests as a member.
The minutes are basically published today. The only minutes apparently that are not posted are compensation committee minutes – but even then we could at least note the items discussed without necessarily disclosing some personal information.
With regard to financials– we are already moving towards the same standards as publicly listed companies in the USA. We now provide quarterly financial reporting, and a quarterly call where the community can question the CEO and the CFO on the income and expenditure. It would not be normal to provide people with access to the raw accounting system (in this case Great Plains) – which would include information on payments to all staff etc.
We do use an external auditor to validate our financials and processes once per year.
If there is a community concern about a particular financial matter (e.g concern about whether procurement policies were being followed) – then I think it would be more appropriate if the single legal entity that represents the community powers has the right to appoint an external auditor to validate any particular process or numbers and report back to the community. Audit firms have the appropriate skills to analyse financial accounting records and also have appropriate procedures in place for confidentiality.
I think we should be focussing on improving the processes we already have. I advocated moving to quarterly financial reporting, and I have certainly been a strong advocate of making things as public as possible, and welcome suggestions for improving our processes.
Regards, Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community