But: let's move forward and not waste time on fingerpointing. All the best, Thomas ======== rickert.net PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.
Am 27.09.2015 um 12:55 schrieb Thomas Rickert <rickert@anwaelte.de>:
Just to be clear, I asked the board multiple times to share their concerns to a list we produced. That would have been one opportunity to speak to that, Chris.
Thomas
======== rickert.net
PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.
Am 27.09.2015 um 09:20 schrieb Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au>:
Hi Malcolm,
The Board was not asked that question.
Cheers,
Chris
On 28 Sep 2015, at 02:16 , Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 27/09/2015 15:48, Nigel Roberts wrote:
Unless the community give up the idea of ICANN having members (whether one or seven billion) the Board will not agree a common proposal.
I wish I had been able to attend the face-to-face meeting.
Were the Board able to be any more clear as to why they insist on the community giving up on the idea of having at least a single member?
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community