Hi, Not sure about buses, but I agree with the rest. Given the Board's role in the finalization of the Accountability WS1 plan, they are not, and cannot be considered, ordinary participants in this process. I think the Board members have three modes of interaction, at least: - as individual participants who voices are as important as any other individual voice, but whose opinions give us a clue as to what the Board might do. - as liaisons - as members of the Board, where they have the power to mark our recommendations with grades indicating their degree of acceptance. It is the Board that is the gate on moving forward with any plan for ICANN Accountabilty. These are the folks we had the Thursday meeting with. I very much hope we can find a way to share making the decision on the plan to be submitted to NTIA, because I think it is the only option at this multistakeholder juncture. avri On 08-Sep-15 15:52, Greg Shatan wrote:
Did anyone get the license plate number of the bus that "participated" with me?
We can choose to treat the Board's intervention as "participation," but it did not have the feeling of participation to me. It had the feeling of the Board attempting to exercise its position of power.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com <mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Even though I would have preferred seeing board's comment earlier than now. I believe what is written below is still order. I quote a section below that may need to be in bold as well.
"....if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with the community."
We are still in proposal development process and board is participating in the process.
Regards
Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 8 Sep 2015 19:58, "Paul Rosenzweig" <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com>> wrote:
All
In preparation for our call today, I wanted to share with you the following that I pulled from the hearing that the Senate Commerce Committee held earlier this year:
***
The Chairman: Will the ICANN Board send a proposal to NTIA that lessens the Board’s power or authority?
Mr. Chehade: We will if the community and the stakeholders present us with a proposal. We will give it to NTIA, and we committed already that we will not change the proposal, that if we have views on that proposal, we should participate with the community. Once that proposal comes from our stakeholders, we will pass it on to NTIA *as is*.
***
I would read this as a commitment from ICANN and the Board.
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
Red Branch Consulting, PLLC
509 C St. NE
Washington, DC 20002
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739>
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
www.redbranchconsulting.com <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/>
www.paulrosenzweigesq.com <http://www.paulrosenzweigesq.com/>
Link to my PGP Key <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus