Today (17-Jul) we reviewed and revised the proposal to bring AoC Reviews into the ICANN Bylaws. By my notes, here are the changes we agreed today: Preference for option 2 on team composition, so removed 3-May proposal and Option 1. Allow ATRT to amend these reviews, too. Add 1 ICANN board member to each review team under option 2. Note that our 3-May draft had a board member on each team. Bruce Tonkin suggested requiring review teams to Prioritize their recommendations. We heard several objections to making that a requirement, so I added it as a suggestion: "The review team should attempt to assign priorities to its recommendations." Remaining challenges: How to give review team access to ICANN Internal documents, while preventing disclosure/publication of information that is sensitive, confidential, or proprietary? Do we impose sanctions for unauthorized disclosure? HELP NEEDED HERE. Steve Crocker recommended changing the AoC commitments for WHOIS/Directory Services. We heard some agreement with that idea, but strong cautions about attempting to drop WHOIS commitments as part of the transition. Instead, amendments to the WHOIS/Directory Services review could be recommended by the first post-transition ATRT. — Steve DelBianco Executive Director NetChoice http://www.NetChoice.org<http://www.netchoice.org/> and http://blog.netchoice.org<http://blog.netchoice.org/> +1.703.615.6206