Hi all, In agreement with Andrew as well. Best Regards On 4/26/16, Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
+1
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 26.04.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org<mailto:robin@ipjustice.org>>:
I agree with Greg. This is a clarification in the text that does not change the report in any way.
Thanks, Robin
On Apr 26, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> wrote:
I've replied to this point on the original thread. In short, my proposal does not change the report. If anything, the current proposed bylaws text changes the report by implying that a higher level of approval for the FOI was intended, when that was not the intent of the group or the proposal.
Greg
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hopefully part of my message is not quoted to imply I support changing the report(it's rather to raise the obvious implication of opening up an already submitted report). However, just to remove any doubt, It's a +1 from me on what you have said as well.
Cheers!
Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 26 Apr 2016 14:35, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote: On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:29:30PM +0100, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
if there is consensus (based on CCWG charter) to change the report that was already submitted in the manner proposed then i am fine with it as well.
I am under the impression that, regardless of its consensus, CCWG-Accountability can't change the report. The report's been shipped off. It's the report that people are evaluating, not the state of CCWG consensus at any given time.
This is why I have expressed, in some cases strongly, rather serious reservations about the way "implementation" has proceeded such that some things the CCWG said may be being adjusted. Most serious, in my opinion, is the continued inclusion of 1.1(d) in the draft bylaws. 1.1(d)(ii) includes references to documents that aren't written and can't possibly be evaluated. It even includes a reference to an agreement between ICANN and an entity that does not yet exist and that might not be named as it is named in these draft bylaws. The idea that one can evaluate such a bylaw is, quite frankly, stupefying. Yet the inclusion of this provision means that the to-be-written contract (or under (F) any renewal thereof) can include any provision at all, and it won't be subject to challenge.
The CCWG can't change its report now, and it must ensure that the bylaws actually conform with the report as it is written. If this creates facts that people are unhappy with, well, that's what amendment procedures are for. We'll get to see whether the Empowered Community actually can work as a community.
Best regards,
A
-- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254733206359 Skype: barrack.otieno PGP ID: 0x2611D86A