On 4 Oct 2016, at 5:43 AM, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Well said Mathieu.
Thanks again to all members of the CCWG on Accountability that contributed to the final report - it stood the test of unbelievable scrutiny in recent months.
Indeed Bruce! As just one example, it is not at all clear whether a “weaker” model of ICANN accountability (i.e. something failed to provide the community with a statutory right to remove some/all of the Board members) would have actually passed the level of scrutiny that the IANA stewardship transition received. The enormous effort by the CCWG on Accountability should be recognized as instrumental to the IANA stewardship transition success (even if the community never needs to exercise some of the mechanisms that were the result!) /John p.s. my views alone.