Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CCWG Accountability Stress Tests Meeting # 5 on 29 April will be available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895716 Action Items ACTION ITEM - Steve to draft paragraph that takes up three or four points that Mathieu identified ACTION - Steve to provide DIY text Notes These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content of the call and do not substitute in any way the transcript. 1 Review red text Red text on p 11 and 16 - Proposed measure to except ICANN from exceeding mission Proposed mission statement could be standard of review It would take reconsideration or IRP to trigger it. AGREEMENT - New text to be added quoting standard of review 2 Address Mathieu's edits (blue text) - P3 Stress Test # 9 Spilling Board would be a potential accountability mechanism but never regarded as useful one i.e. last resort AGREEMENT - OK with proposed text - p4 Stress Test #11 Suggestions to remove "mitigation", to use risk mitigation measures", to remove "preventive" AGREEMENT - risk mitigation -p7 Stress Test #21 AGREEMENT Ok with following edit "develop appropriate mechanism - p12 Stress test #13 Standing is available to community. Is term "appeal" appropriate? Suggestion to use reconsideration and IRPs We have not identified different standards of review --> Discourage different standards --> Would not recommend putting standards of review in WS1 work - Suggestion to remove sentence: standards of review may need to be ajdusted sentene and to include Mathieu's text - WS1 - WS2 or future Review panels? AGREEMENT - Remove sentence: standards of review may need to be ajdusted sentene and to include Mathieu's text. Frivolous and vexatious: match with what is in the proposal --> frivolous and abusive Conclusion cell Suggested text: Proposed measures would reduce risk by supermajority requirements and by dismissla of frivolous or abusive RR and IRPs Individual will have standing but expectation that people use it in way that is accountable to community - Proposal: Proposed measures would could increase risk of individuals paralyzing ICANN processes, which is mitigated by dismissal of frivolous or abusive RR and IRPs - Suggestion to use "overload" --> Continued usage may paralyze business, not just overload it --> Improperly impede/interfere AGREEMENT - Remove overload and use impede - Improved access to review and redress could allow indivdual to impede ICANN processes, though this is mitigated by dismissal of frivolous or abusive RR and IRPs 3. Consider adding management abstract paragraph ACTION ITEM - Steve to draft paragraph that takes up three or four points that Mathieu identified 4. To help manage public comment process, do it yourself guide to prevent additional stress-tests being added Do it yourself to guide current proposed and measures making it clear that community powers we are designing can not prevent external threat (hacker, earthquake etc). Suggestion to give example of specific concerns and show how that gets translated using buckets we have ACTION - Steve to provide DIY text
