I always thought that it was a sign of intelligence to reconsider positions when the situation changes, and particularly when the key issues that drove the decision have substantially changed. I am sure that the good doctor follows this process in his medical practice. Alan At 12/11/2015 08:42 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Far be it for me to wade into this logorrhea, but for needing to point that the Sole Member Model was rejected AFTER the fact by the very same members appointed by ALAC to the CCWG who had supported it DURING the process.
el
On 2015-11-12 15:34, Malcolm Hutty wrote: [...]
The reason we came back to re-draft the proposal was because first our initial Reference Model, and then the Sole Member Model both received substantial pushback in the public comment. [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community