Mr. Currie’s statement about the Board’s intervention captures in clear and direct prose exactly what many of us are instinctively feeling about the Board’s lack of respect for the MSM process. Well done. Paul Paul Rosenzweig <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article...> Link to my PGP Key From: Jordan Carter [mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz] Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 8:13 PM To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] W Currie and auDA comments to CCWG Hi all I thought that the comments lodged by auDA and by Willie Currie were both useful reading. auDA does provide several constructive criticisms that will certainly be useful to WP1, and no doubt more broadly. Willie provides a defence of the multistakeholder model, and of the CCWG's core proposals, and sets out in clear and direct language why the discussion with the Board last week was rather problematic for the majority of those who took part in the call. Willie, as a reminder, is one of the Expert Advisors appointed to assist the CCWG with its work. Worth reading both. auDA: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00009.h... Currie: http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00016.h... cheers, Jordan