I don't need examples. I know examples exist. Indeed, the fact that the RFCs have fallen into desuetude in respect of .COM is the best example. I was specifically referring to intentional language in RFC 1591 and possibly earlier RFCs that established the Domain Name System. I suggest that to the main extent, any hypothetical proprietary rights creation would have occurred then, not now. On 23/05/16 12:46, Arasteh wrote:
O
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 May 2016, at 12:28, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
Many of the policies governing the root zone from the rfcs do _not_ apply throughout the tree. I feel on pretty confident ground about this. If you need examples I will provide when I'm at a real machine, but as a general matter it is dangerous to reason from "policy in ." to "policy for all domains." The protocol is different.
A